Re:
|
Format,
Inc., a Nevada corporation
|
Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB
|
|
Filed
September 1, 2006
|
|
File
No. 0-52213
|
1.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to provide a history of the Company’s
business operations and
developments.
|
2.
|
The
Company has revised Footnote 1 to the financial statements to specify
that
the Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada.
|
3.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify the date that the Company
became eligible for trading on the pink sheets and that no trading
has
occurred since that date.
|
4.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify recent operating losses
and
that the Company expects to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable
future.
|
5.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify that Mr. Neely devotes
90 %
of his business time to the
Company.
|
6.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to distinguish clearly between
current
and planned activities.
|
7.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to describe at greater length
what is
involved in the “EDGARization” of
documents.
|
8.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify that its printing services
will not become a material part of the business in the foreseeable
future.
|
9.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to clarify the nature and timing
of the
Company’s goal to become a “dominant provider” of EDGARizing services in
light of the Company’s discussion regarding the nature of its
competition.
|
10.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to underline the section title,
“Risk
Factors” and move the preamble narrative down a
space.
|
11.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify a risk factor for its
reliance on a small number of customers for most of its
revenues.
|
12.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure regarding its ability to handle
maximum
workloads in light of the disclosure that it has one full-time employee
and one part-time employee.
|
13.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure in this risk factor and elsewhere
to
clarify the extent to which a small number of businesses dominate
the
market.
|
14.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify its expected need for
additional funds of approximately $100,000, and to discuss its current
reliance on interest-free loans from Mr.
Neely.
|
15.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify the risks of not being
able
to fund its sales and marketing
activities.
|
16.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to avoid references to “officers” in
plural and in particular revise the phrase “various members of our
management team” in that risk
factor.
|
17.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to provide discussion and analysis
relating to other non-operating income and
expense.
|
18.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to include discussion and analysis
of
its financial condition and changes in financial condition for each
period
presented.
|
19.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify the reasons why it
was
unable to pay its invoices, whether it paid its invoices subsequent
to the
year-end, and any implications of its inability to pay
invoices.
|
20.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to disclose the information required
by
Item 303(a) of regulation S-B.
|
21.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify the number of holders
of the
Company’s stock.
|
22.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to specify that the differences
between
the total of the issuances herein and the amount specified in the
financial statements if additional paid in capital by Mr. Neely in
2002,
and to specify the first issuance of 163,833 shares was at $0.03
for
proceeds of approximately $4,915.
|
23.
|
The
disclosures have been revised to incorporate the following relating
to the
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts in the Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies in Note 2.
|
24.
|
The
journal entries used to record the transactions with respect to the
shares
the President received as payment by the Company’s customers were as
follows:
|
25.
|
The
Company has revised its statements of cash flows accordingly as noted
in
accordance with paragraph 22(a) of SFAS
95.
|
26.
|
Despite
the fact that the Company does have retained earnings, the retained
earnings is the result of the realized and unrealized gains in their
marketable securities, and has reconsidered these facts in discussions
with their auditor, and as a result the auditor has re-issued their
opinion with the uncertainty of the Company continuing as a going
concern,
and has incorporated managements plans to mitigate these conditions
that
give rise to the uncertainty. The Company has added a risk
factor.
|
27.
|
The
Company does not consider the rental and other income it receives
to be a
material part of their business. The Company will include their policy
for
recognition of this in their revenue recognition
disclosures.
|
28.
|
The
Company will provide a roll-forward schedule on its allowance for
doubtful
accounts for each of the periods presented in its revised financials
statements.
|
29.
|
As
specified in response to Comment No. 23, the securities the Company
holds
are from active trading public reporting companies, so their values
are
readily determinable. The Company receives the securities from its
President, who received the securities as payments on obligations
of its
customers. The Company does not hold the stock too long, as they
need the
cash for cash flow purposes. The Company at any holding period has
determined the fair value of the marketable securities approximates
carrying value, as the market values are readily determinable and
can be
calculated easily. The Company calculates the realized and unrealized
gains and losses based on these values for each of the periods
presented.
|
30.
|
The
names of each specific entity issuer for each marketable security
held
during the periods presented are as
follows:
|
Name
of Issuer
|
Acquisition
|
Disposal
|
Litfunding
Corp.
|
June
2005
|
August
2005
|
Cobalis
Corp.
|
February
2005
|
March and August 2005 |
April 2006 |
September
2006
|
|
IVI
Communications, Inc.
|
February
2006
|
March 2006 |
31.
|
The
amount funded and recorded as a loan receivable to this related company
that is principally owned by one
of our shareholders that owns less than one percent of our issued
and
outstanding shares,
was made by the Company based on the business that the company was
doing,
and the fact that they were planning on going public and utilize
the
services of the Company. The Company has provided no services to
this
company to date.
|
32.
|
The
individual that was loaned the amounts in question was a related
party.
This has been included in the revised financial statement
disclosures.
|
33.
|
The
Company has imputed interest at a rate of 4% per annum, the rate
at which
the Company would be able to receive funds from a financial institution
or
that the amounts loaned would have been obtained from a financial
institution for the shareholder advance and the loan receivable.
These
amounts were not recorded as they were not considered material to
the
financial statements taken as a whole.
|
34.
|
The
disclosures have been revised to include a reconciliation between
the
statutory rate and the effective tax rate as referred to in paragraph
47
of SFAS 109.
|
35.
|
The
Company had parenthetically described the timing differences as described
in SFAS 109, and has revised the disclosure to include charts noting
these
differences and the changes in the valuation allowances in the revised
footnote disclosures.
|
36.
|
The
Company has deleted the duplicative presentation of the financial
information for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004.
|
37.
|
The
Company has revised the statement of cash flows for consistency.
Hall and
Company was provided adequate opportunity to review, discussions
occurred
between Hall and Company and Michael Pollack, and both auditors concurred.
|
38.
|
The
Company has revised its disclosure to include Exhibit 16, a letter
from
its former independent accountant stating whether it agrees with
the
Company’s representation made in response to Item 304(a) of Regulate
S-B.
|
/s/ Michael Muellerleile | |||
Michael Muellerleile |
· |
the
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure
in
the filing;
|
· |
staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do
not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing; and
|
· |
the
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
laws of the United States.
|
Format,
Inc.
|
||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Ryan A. Neely | |
Ryan A. Neely
President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
|